How To Fight Back When Workers Comp is Denied

denied workers comp claim

Contributed by: Dan Rose

Getting a denial letter on a workers’ compensation claim feels like a door slamming shut. You have been dealing with pain for months, maybe years. You finally reported it, saw a doctor, filed the paperwork, and then the insurance carrier said no. I understand the frustration, and I want to be direct with you. A denial is not the end of your case. In fact, for repetitive stress injuries in New York, initial denials are so common that experienced attorneys often plan for them from the start. The appeals process exists for a reason, and workers who push forward with the right strategy frequently end up receiving the full benefits they were owed all along.

If your repetitive stress injury claim has been denied or your benefits have been reduced, here is what is actually happening and how to fight back effectively.

Why Insurance Carriers Love Denying Repetitive Stress Claims

Let me be blunt about the dynamics at play. Insurance companies are businesses. Their job is to pay out as little as possible. Repetitive stress injuries give them more room to maneuver than almost any other type of workplace claim, and they know it.

With a broken leg from a fall on a job site, there is usually a clear incident, a date, witnesses, and a medical report that ties everything together neatly. With carpal tunnel syndrome, chronic tendonitis, or a deteriorating lower back from years of repetitive lifting, none of those clean facts exist. There is no single event. The onset is gradual. And there are almost always alternative explanations the carrier can point to.

I have seen denial letters that blame a worker’s age, their weight, a prior medical history, recreational hobbies, even genetics. One carrier argued that a food service worker’s shoulder condition was caused by playing with her children, not by the overhead reaching she did forty hours a week for six years. These arguments are not always made in bad faith, but they are almost always designed to test whether you will fight back.

  • Common Denial Reasons: The carrier claims the injury is not work-related, attributes it to a pre-existing condition, argues the worker waited too long to report, or states that the medical documentation does not establish a clear occupational link.
  • Strategic Testing: Many initial denials are a calculated bet that the worker will give up rather than go through an appeal. Statistics show that represented workers are far more likely to overturn denials than those who go it alone.
  • Burden of Proof Reality: Under New York law, repetitive stress injuries are classified as occupational diseases. That means you must demonstrate that your condition arose from hazards specific to your type of work, a higher standard than for acute injuries.

What a Denial Actually Means Under New York Law

A denial does not mean the Workers’ Compensation Board has reviewed your case and ruled against you. In most situations, it means the employer’s insurance carrier has decided not to accept liability, and now the matter will go before an administrative law judge for a hearing. Think of it less like a verdict and more like the other side saying, “Prove it.”

That hearing is your opportunity to present medical evidence, employment records, and testimony that connects your repetitive stress injury to your job duties. The judge evaluates the evidence from both sides and issues a decision. If the evidence supports your claim, the denial gets overturned and your benefits begin, sometimes with back pay included.

This is also where having a Queens attorney for workplace injury claims makes the biggest difference. The insurance carrier will have legal counsel at every hearing. Walking in without representation puts you at a serious disadvantage, especially in cases where the medical causation is being contested.

  • Hearing Process: You will appear before a Workers’ Compensation Board judge who reviews evidence from both parties and makes a determination.
  • Back Benefits: If your denial is overturned, you may be entitled to retroactive wage replacement going back to when your disability or lost time first began.
  • No Upfront Cost: In New York, workers’ compensation attorney fees are set by the Board and paid by the insurance carrier after an award is issued. You do not pay out of pocket to get representation.

Strengthening Your Case After a Denial

If your claim has been denied, the single most important thing you can do is improve your medical documentation. In my experience, weak or vague medical reports are the leading cause of unsuccessful repetitive stress claims, not because the injury is not real, but because the paperwork did not tell the full story.

Your treating physician needs to provide a clear, detailed opinion that your condition was caused or significantly worsened by specific, identifiable work activities. A report that says “patient has tendonitis” is not nearly as effective as one that says “patient has tendonitis in the right shoulder consistent with repetitive overhead reaching performed during employment as a commercial painter for approximately five years.” The second version gives the judge something concrete to evaluate. The first gives the insurance carrier room to argue.

Beyond medical records, gather anything that helps paint a picture of your daily work routine. Job descriptions, shift schedules, photographs of your workstation, communications with your employer about the physical demands of your role. If coworkers can attest to the repetitive nature of your tasks, their statements can add meaningful support.

  • Medical Report Upgrade: If your doctor’s initial report was generic, ask for a supplemental opinion that explicitly ties your diagnosis to the repetitive motions your job required. Specificity wins these cases.
  • Employment Evidence: Collect job descriptions, duty rosters, or any internal documents that describe the physical requirements of your position. These help establish that the repetitive exposure was a core part of your role, not incidental.
  • Witness Statements: Coworkers, supervisors, or even clients who observed your work tasks daily can provide written or verbal statements supporting the repetitive nature of your job duties.

The Pre-Existing Condition Problem (and Why It Does Not Disqualify You)

One of the most discouraging things I hear from Queens workers is, “They said I already had this condition before I started the job, so I cannot get benefits.” This is one of the most misunderstood aspects of New York workers’ compensation law, and insurance carriers rely on that misunderstanding.

Here is the reality. New York explicitly allows workers’ comp claims even when a pre-existing condition is involved, as long as you can show that your job duties made the condition measurably worse. If you had mild arthritis in your wrist before you took a data entry position, and five years of constant typing turned that mild arthritis into debilitating carpal tunnel syndrome requiring surgery, your claim can absolutely succeed. The law recognizes that jobs aggravate existing conditions, and it provides benefits accordingly.

In fact, New York law even allows a worker who previously received comp benefits for a repetitive stress injury to file again if they returned to work and the condition worsened. The system is designed to account for the way these injuries evolve over time.

  • Aggravation Standard: You do not need to prove your job was the sole cause of your condition. You need to prove it made a pre-existing condition materially worse.
  • Re-Filing Rights: If you returned to work after a prior repetitive stress claim and the same condition has deteriorated, you may be eligible to file a new claim.
  • Insurance Carrier Tactics: Expect the carrier to use your medical history against you. An experienced attorney will anticipate this strategy and prepare counter-evidence, including updated medical opinions and functional assessments.

Do Not Let a Denial Letter Write the Final Chapter

Insurance carriers count on workers giving up after a denial. The paperwork is intimidating, the process feels adversarial, and the pain you are already managing makes fighting an uphill battle feel impossible. But here is what I have seen over and over again in Queens. Workers who push forward, who get proper representation and build a documented case, recover the benefits they were owed from the beginning. A denial is not a determination of your claim’s merit. It is just the starting line of the next phase.

If you have received a denial on a repetitive stress injury claim, or if your benefits were reduced or cut off, a Queens workers’ comp attorney for repetitive stress injuries can evaluate your case, identify where the gaps are, and represent you at hearings where it counts.


Contributed by Dan Rose, A Senior Workers’ Compensation Legal Analyst.

Dealing with a Repetitive Stress Injury from Work?
The team at Beck Law P.C. has helped thousands of injured Queens workers secure the benefits they deserve.
Visit https://becklawny.com/ to schedule your free consultation and learn what your claim may be worth.

Get Directions Below!

Beck Law, 71-19 80th St Suite 8-206, Glendale, NY 11385, (516) 388-7785

What is the LLC Transparency Act?

Assemblymember Gallagher stands in a neutral-toned room, wearing a blue blazer over a white shirt.
Assemblymember Gallagher stands in a neutral-toned room, wearing a blue blazer over a white shirt.
Emily Gallagher is one of the sponsors of the LLC Transparency Act (Credit: NY State Assembly)

By Carmo Moniz | news@queensledger.com

The New York legislature recently passed an act that would require those operating or profiting from limited liability companies, a type of business that shields the owner from personal consequences over debts and other liabilities, to disclose their names, addresses and other information, some of which would be included in a public database.

The new legislation, called the LLC Transparency Act, is meant to target money laundering and other financial crimes by publicly identifying beneficial owners of LLCs. The act was co-authored by Greenpoint Assemblywoman Emily Gallagher and State Senator Brad Hoylman.

“LLCs are used in a variety of ways, and because of their anonymity, they’ve really opened up the door to people not taking responsibility for certain things that their business does, as well as using LLCs as a mask to do illegal activities,” Gallagher said in a recent phone interview. “That’s pretty wide ranging, everything from wage theft, to tenant problems to drug trafficking.”

The act, which Governor Kathy Hochul is expected to sign into law, is similar to the federal Corporate Transparency Act that will go into effect this coming January. Unlike the CTA, however, which requires all corporations to disclose beneficial owner information to a confidential database, the LLC transparency Act would create a database searchable by the public, with the names and business addresses of beneficial owners.

The public database is likely to be beneficial for tenants, many of whom do not currently know their landlords’ identities if the owner of their building is filed under an LLC. Anonymous LLCs can also be used by landlords to evade code inspections, according to Gallagher’s legislative director.

“It’s insane that we bestow that legal privilege upon people anonymously, but that’s been the norm thus far,” the director said. “We have to adjust expectations of what should be expected of corporations doing business in New York, and I think it was a public policy mistake to let corporations do business in New York with only a P.O. box.”

The legislation would make it easier for tenants to take legal action against their landlords in the case of negligence, according to Yana Kucheva, an associate professor of sociology at the City College of New York and an expert in housing policy. Kucheva said that the act would also allow tenants with negligent landlords to find other buildings owned by their landlord and organize with tenants across properties.

“If something bad is happening to you, chances are that your landlord, if they own another building somewhere else, they might be neglecting that building as well,” Kucheva said. “This type of law would shift the balance in who might have the upper hand in a court if you can actually find your landlord more easily.”

Roberto Rodriguez, a tenant in Williamsburg, said he thinks the act will make it easier for tenants to resolve issues with their landlords and that it is a necessity that tenants know who their landlord is.

“It gives tenants that piece of leverage because now you know exactly who to go after in the courts,” Rodriguez said. “Right now there’s nothing we can do in the court system to protect ourselves, and knowing who owns the building is great.”

The act would also help create better housing legislation, according to Gallagher, as it would give lawmakers a better idea of how many buildings people own on average.

LLCs are relatively new in the United States, with the first one having been established in the late 1970s. Gallagher said that these kinds of corporations have been badly abused, and are currently easier to get than a library card.

“This is not something that is baked into the origins of American business,” Gallagher said. “Transparency is a really good thing that we should be seeking and protecting, and it’s terrible that folks who are cheating, either consumers or other businesses, have had such an advantage for so long.”

Under the act, beneficial owners of LLCs would also be required to disclose their date of birth and a unique identification number, such as from a passport or driver’s license, to the government. A beneficial owner is a person who controls or profits from an LLC, with some exceptions listed in the act. The 23 exceptions to the definition, which are the same as those in the CTA definition of a beneficial owner, include minors, banks, credit unions and governmental authorities.

Many countries outside the United States have long had corporate transparency laws like the CTA and LLC Transparency Act in place. In 2014, the European Union established a transparency rule similar to the CTA, and in 2016 the United Kingdom created a public register for beneficial owners of corporations.

Samantha Sheeber, a real estate attorney at Starr Associates LLP, said that she doesn’t see the act discouraging property ownership under LLCs, but that she thinks it is not clear enough what would count as having a significant privacy interest, which would allow a beneficial owner’s information to remain confidential. She also said she thinks the goals of the act could be accomplished without a public database.

“What they were trying to accomplish here, really could have been accomplished by having this same database, the same requirements, but not on a public scale,” Sheeber said. “They could have done all the enforcement, they could have had all the registration requirements done in a capacity that law enforcement or regulatory enforcement could have been enforced, but it wouldn’t be on a public open domain.”

Gallagher’s legislative director said that the legislation is less specific because the details of what counts as a significant privacy interest are being put under the responsibility of the department of state, and that there will be a period for comment before the agency implements regulations.

The director also said that there are many benefits to the database of beneficial owners being public, including that it would allow the public to flag illegal behavior by beneficial owners and help lawmakers make more informed public policy decisions.

“Among the motivations of the bill is the fact that the benefits that beneficial ownership transparency can bring to the public, to government and to civil society and to the business industry, are dependent upon that information being public,” the director said. “This bill creating a public database is the main motivation, the federal government’s already going to be collecting this information, but it does a disservice to the public to have it be private.”

James Vacca, a former New York City Councilmember and a distinguished lecturer at Queens College, said that he had pushed for LLC transparency during his time in office, but that he was unable to pass anything because LLCs are state entities and were therefore outside of his jurisdiction.

“They’ve been used to circumvent transparency and accountability, so anything that sheds light, anything that gives citizens information and gives sunlight to where there was none before, I think is a step in the right direction,” Vacca said. “The transparency that a law like this provides is invaluable.”

Real Estate Law 102: Article 12A & Everything Related

Real Estate Law Greenpoint Brooklyn

Article 12A is an important piece of legislation that affects the real estate industry. It is a section of the New York State Real Property Law, and it outlines  the disclosure requirements for real estate transactions. In this article, we will explore everything you need to know about Article 12A and how it impacts real estate transactions. Fasten your seat-belts as you are about to get the full scoop and low down on everything related to Article 12A by a local Greenpoint, Brooklyn Real Estate & Business Lawyer.

What is Article 12A?

Article 12A is a New York State law that was enacted in 1985. It is also known as the Real Property Law Disclosure Act. The purpose of Article 12A is to ensure that buyers of real estate have access to important information about the property they are considering purchasing. Article 12A applies to residential real estate transactions that involve one to four dwelling units. This includes single-family homes, condominiums, co-ops, and townhouses.

What Does Article 12A Require?

Article 12A requires sellers of residential real estate to provide buyers with a Property Condition Disclosure Statement. This statement outlines any known defects or conditions that could affect the property’s value or safety. The Property Condition Disclosure Statement must be provided to the buyer before the purchase contract is signed. The statement must also be signed by the seller and dated. The Property Condition Disclosure Statement covers a wide range of issues, including:

  • The presence of lead-based paint
  • The condition of the roof, foundation, and other structural elements
  • The condition of the plumbing, electrical, and heating systems
  • The presence of pests or other nuisances
  • The existence of any environmental hazards or other factors that could affect the property’s value or safety.

If the seller is not aware of any defects or conditions, they must still provide a Property Condition Disclosure Statement indicating that they have no knowledge of any such issues.

How Does Article 12A Impact Real Estate Transactions?

Article 12A is an important piece of legislation that protects buyers of real estate. By requiring sellers to disclose any known defects or conditions, buyers can make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with the purchase. Failure to provide a Property Condition Disclosure Statement can result in legal action against the seller. In some cases, buyers may be able to rescind the contract or sue the seller for damages if they can prove that the seller knew about a defect or condition and failed to disclose it.

Conclusion

Article 12A is an important piece of legislation that protects buyers of residential real estate in New York State. By requiring sellers to disclose any known defects or conditions, buyers can make informed decisions about whether or not to proceed with the purchase. Failure to provide a Property Condition Disclosure Statement can result in legal action against the seller, so it is important for sellers to comply with this law. Buyers should also carefully review the Property Condition Disclosure Statement and consider hiring a home inspector to ensure that they are fully informed about the condition of the property.


Contributed With Help From:

Fisher Stone, P.C. NYC Corporate, Small Business & Trademark Lawyer 115 Broadway Floor 5, New York, NY 10006 (212) 256-1877 https://fisherstonelaw.com/

Fisher Stone Small Business & Real Estate Lawyers Of Brooklyn, P.C. 88 Suydam St Suite A, Brooklyn, NY 11221, United States